SaaStr · 2015-08-07 · 3953d

Why Australian Venture Firms Pursue Lower-Risk Investment Strategies Compared to Silicon Valley

Jason Lemkin explains that venture firms outside Silicon Valley appear more risk-averse because they target smaller exit outcomes ($50M-$100M) rather than unicorn exits ($1B+), requiring lower entry valuations and capital deployment to achieve portfolio returns. Silicon Valley VCs can justify higher valuations and larger investments because they're chasing outsized returns from unicorn outcomes. The difference is outcome-driven: geographic location correlates with exit size targets and investment thesis constraints.

4 metrics· Cited 0× in the knowledge base ·Open source ↗

Metrics in this report

Non-Bay Area VC Target Exit Range

50-100$M

typical range

Australian and regional VC firms

Pre-Money Valuation Discrepancy

12$M vs $1M

ratio

Post-YC 3-customer company vs 30-customer company

Target Portfolio Return Multiple

3x

minimum

Required for $50M-$100M exit targets

Unicorn Exit Threshold

1000$M

minimum

Silicon Valley VC target exit size