Report · 2020-03-11 · 2276d

The Zero-Sum Fallacy: ARR vs. Services

The article critiques the 'zero-sum delusion' that enterprise SaaS companies fall into when they treat professional services and ARR as competing for a fixed customer budget, arguing that customers actually budget separately for implementation services and view them as insurance on project success. Kellogg provides a framework for fixing this misconception through organizational changes including hiring rainmaker services leaders, creating separate P&Ls for services, engaging services early in sales, and adjusting compensation incentives.

7 metrics· Cited 0× in the knowledge base ·Open source ↗

Metrics in this report

Business Objects Deal Size Range

100000-200000$

ARR range

Historical example

MicroStrategy Competitive Deal Size

4000000$

blended ARR + services

SeasEdge retail transformation example

One-Year Deal Churn Rate

25%

or higher, indicator of failed implementations

Affected SaaS companies

Services Gross Margin

-20 to -60%

indicator of zero-sum delusion

Affected SaaS companies

Services Revenue as Percentage of Total

40%

target

Enterprise SaaS companies doing $250K+ ARR deals

Services Revenue as Percentage of Total

<10%

indicator of zero-sum delusion

Affected SaaS companies

Typical Enterprise Deal Size

250000$

ARR amount

Classic enterprise SaaS vendors