The Zero-Sum Fallacy: ARR vs. Services
The article critiques the 'zero-sum delusion' that enterprise SaaS companies fall into when they treat professional services and ARR as competing for a fixed customer budget, arguing that customers actually budget separately for implementation services and view them as insurance on project success. Kellogg provides a framework for fixing this misconception through organizational changes including hiring rainmaker services leaders, creating separate P&Ls for services, engaging services early in sales, and adjusting compensation incentives.
Metrics in this report
100000-200000$
ARR range
Historical example
4000000$
blended ARR + services
SeasEdge retail transformation example
25%
or higher, indicator of failed implementations
Affected SaaS companies
-20 to -60%
indicator of zero-sum delusion
Affected SaaS companies
40%
target
Enterprise SaaS companies doing $250K+ ARR deals
<10%
indicator of zero-sum delusion
Affected SaaS companies
250000$
ARR amount
Classic enterprise SaaS vendors