Dave Kellogg's blog · 2019-05-21 · 2571d

The Rule of 40: Declining Predictive Power but Still Relevant

Dave Kellogg analyzes the Rule of 40 metric using Battery Ventures data, finding that while it explains 58% of EV/revenue multiples, its explanatory power has declined from 20% above revenue growth alone (2015-2016) to only 7-8% (2017-2018). The article argues the Rule of 40 remains useful for thinking about growth vs. profitability balance but has limited applicability for early-stage startups.

6 metrics· Cited 0× in the knowledge base ·Open source ↗

Metrics in this report

CrowdStrike ARR growth

121%

FY2019

ending ARR of $312M

CrowdStrike Rule of 40 score

84%

subscription revenue basis

110% growth + -26% FCF margin

Revenue Growth R-squared

0.51coefficient

current (2018-2019)

EV multiple explanation for public software companies

Rule of 40 R-squared

0.58coefficient

current (2018-2019)

EV multiple explanation for public software companies

Rule of 40 explanatory power advantage

7-8%

current (2017-2018)

percentage points above revenue growth alone

Rule of 40 explanatory power advantage

15-20%

historical (2015-2016)

percentage points above revenue growth alone