SaaStr · 2021-08-05 · 1763d

Optimal Marketing Spend in SaaS: Moving Beyond the S+M=ACV Rule

Jason Lemkin argues that while the S+M=ACV axiom provides a useful planning framework, SaaS companies should spend opportunistically on individual marketing programs that generate positive returns, as cheap organic and partner channels balance expensive direct acquisition. Once sales costs are predictable and the core engine works, companies can afford higher marketing spend than their models suggest, especially with high NRR customers whose lifetime value justifies aggressive acquisition spending.

7 metrics· Cited 0× in the knowledge base ·Open source ↗

Metrics in this report

ARR Threshold for Cash Flow Positive Aggressive Marketing

6-8$ millions

range

With predictable sales costs and effective channel mix

Enterprise Customer Lifetime Value Multiplier

6x

minimum

Per $1 spent on acquisition for customers with 110%+ NRR

Marketing Spend as % of First Year ACV

35-40%

example

Well-capitalized SaaS company with 100%+ NRR

Organic/Word-of-Mouth Acquisition Cost

10% of ACV

max

Mini-brand driven customers

Partner/Channel Acquisition Cost

10-50% of ACV

range

Varies by partner quality; 10% barely qualified leads to 50% partner-closed deals

Sales + Marketing Spend as % of First Year ACV

100%

benchmark

Early stage SaaS with sufficient capital; adjusted to 80% at $3-4m ARR for cash flow positivity

Sales Compensation as % of First Year ACV

25-35%

median

SaaS companies with optimized sales comp plans including overhead