Optimal Marketing Spend in SaaS: Moving Beyond the S+M=ACV Rule
Jason Lemkin argues that while the S+M=ACV axiom provides a useful planning framework, SaaS companies should spend opportunistically on individual marketing programs that generate positive returns, as cheap organic and partner channels balance expensive direct acquisition. Once sales costs are predictable and the core engine works, companies can afford higher marketing spend than their models suggest, especially with high NRR customers whose lifetime value justifies aggressive acquisition spending.
Metrics in this report
6-8$ millions
range
With predictable sales costs and effective channel mix
6x
minimum
Per $1 spent on acquisition for customers with 110%+ NRR
35-40%
example
Well-capitalized SaaS company with 100%+ NRR
10% of ACV
max
Mini-brand driven customers
10-50% of ACV
range
Varies by partner quality; 10% barely qualified leads to 50% partner-closed deals
100%
benchmark
Early stage SaaS with sufficient capital; adjusted to 80% at $3-4m ARR for cash flow positivity
25-35%
median
SaaS companies with optimized sales comp plans including overhead